Example — Reviewing the rectangle problem

Check: sides 44 and 88. Perimeter =2(4+8)=24= 2\cdot(4+8) = 24 ✓. Area =48=32= 4\cdot 8 = 32 ✓.

Reflection: the crucial point was turning the two conditions (perimeter, area) into a system of two equations. This transformation is general: any problem with “given perimeter and area” reduces to a system of this kind.

Extension: what happens if the area is 4040? Let us try: x212x+40=0x^2-12x+40=0, discriminant 144160<0144-160 < 0. No real solution! Geometrically: there is no rectangle with perimeter 2424 and area 4040. For which values of AA does one exist? The equation x212x+A=0x^2-12x+A=0 has real solutions when Δ=1444A0\Delta = 144-4A \ge 0, that is A36A\le 36. Interpretation: with perimeter 2424, the greatest possible area is 3636 (the case of the square with side 66). A fine result “handed to us” by reflection!

Topics: Working method
Concepts: Checking the result
Skills: Limiting-case analysis · Modelling